Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diffusionsprozesse digitaler Interventionen erfolgreich gestalten

Hintergrund und Gestaltungsempfehlungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover E-Health-Ökonomie II

Zusammenfassung

Trotz des großen Potentials digitaler Innovationen im Gesundheitswesen mangelt es oft an deren erfolgreicher Diffusion, d. h. Verbreitung, im Gesundheitswesen. Um diesem Problem zu begegnen, wurden in der Nachwuchsforschergruppe Care4Saxony Lösungsansätze und -werkzeuge für die Unterstützung von AkteurInnen im Gesundheitswesen erarbeitet. Der folgende Beitrag beleuchtet den Prozess der Diffusion im Allgemeinen und erläutert die Neuerungen des Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetzes in Deutschland. Darauf aufbauend werden weitere Empfehlungen identifiziert, welche die Diffusion und damit den Erfolg digitaler Interventionen weiter vorantreiben können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Barrieren werden als Faktoren verstanden, welche die Adaption von DI negativ beeinflussen.

  2. 2.

    In der Studie wurde speziell zu Telemedizin-Anwendungen im Sinne einer Klasse spezifischer DI geforscht.

Literatur

  • Abbott PA, Liu Y (2013) A scoping review of telehealth. IMIA Yearb Med Inform 8:51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Albreht T, Kiasuwa R, Van der Bulcke M (Hrsg) (2017) EUROPEAN guide on quality improvement in comprehensive cancer control, CanCon – Cancer Control Joint Action. Scientific Institute of Public Health/National Institute of Public Health, Brussels/Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Barello S, Graffigna G, Vegni E (2012) Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature [WWW document]. Nurs Res Pract. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/905934

  • Böhm K, Schmid A, Götze R, Landwehr C, Rothgang H (2013) Five types of OECD healthcare systems: empirical results of a deductive classification. Health Policy 113:258–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broens THF, Huis in’t Veld RMHA, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT, Nieuwenhuis LJM (2007) Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare 13:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763307781644951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RW, Jumper-Thurman P, Plested BA, Oetting ER, Swanson L (2000) Community readiness: research to practice. J Community Psychol 28:291–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200005)28:3<291::AID-JCOP5>3.0.CO;2-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach G (2001) What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 3:e20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersch M, Rüsike T (2011) Diffusionshemmnisse innovativer E-Health Anwendungen im deutschen Gesundheitswesen. E-Health@Home (Forschung-Gestaltung-Implementierung), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Govender SM, Mars M (2016) The use of telehealth services to facilitate audiological management for children: a scoping review and content analysis. J Telemed Telecare 23:392–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16645728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gros DF, Morland LA, Greene CJ, Acierno R, Strachan M, Egede LE, Tuerk PW, Myrick H, Frueh BC (2013) Delivery of evidence-based psychotherapy via video telehealth. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 35:506–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9363-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häckl D (2010) Neue Technologien im Gesundheitswesen: Rahmenbedingungen und Akteure. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage E, Roo JP, van Offenbeek MAG, Boonstra A (2013) Implementation factors and their effect on e-Health service adoption in rural communities: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harst L, Lantzsch H, Scheibe M (2019a) Theories predicting end-user acceptance of telemedicine use: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 21:e13117. https://doi.org/10.2196/13117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harst L, Timpel P, Otto L, Richter P, Wollschlaeger B, Winkler K, Schlieter H (2019b) Identifying barriers in telemedicine-supported integrated care research: scoping reviews and qualitative content analysis. J Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01065-5

  • Hastall M, Dockweiler C, Mühlhaus J (2017) Achieving end user acceptance: building blocks for an evidence-based user-centered framework for health technology development and assessment. In: Antona M, Stephanidis C (Hrsg) Universal access in human–computer interaction. Human and technological environments. Springer, New York, S 13–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Blaschke S, Lucas H (2017) Beyond pilotitis: taking digital health interventions to the national level in China and Uganda. Glob Health 13:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0275-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang-Jaccard J, Nepal S, Alem L, Li J (2014) Barriers for delivering telehealth in rural Australia: a review based on Australian trials and studies. Telemed J E Health 20:496–504. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennett PA, Jackson A, Healy T, Ho K, Kazanjian A, Woollard RF, Haydt SM, Bates J (2003) A study of a rural community’s readiness for telehealth. J Telemed Telecare 9:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen LK, Knarvik U, Pedersen CD, Tangene W, Whitehouse D (2015) Deliverable 3.4 personalised blueprint for telemedicine deployment: validated and tested version, momentum – European momentum for mainstreaming telemedicine deployment in daily practice. Online-Deliverable - web-Ressource angeben: http://www.telemedicine-momentum.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/02/D3.4_v1.0_ValidatedBlueprint.pdf

  • Karnowski V (2011) Diffusionstheorien. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845260334

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minkman M (2016) The development model for integrated care: a validated tool for evaluation and development. J Integr Care 24:38–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-01-2016-0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkman MM, Vermeulen RP, Ahaus KT, Huijsman R (2013) A survey study to validate a four phases development model for integrated care in the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res 13:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2019) Evidence standards framework for digital health technologies. NICE, Web-Ressource: https://www.nice.org.uk/corporate/ecd7/resources/evidence-standards-framework-for-digitalhealth-technologies-pdf-1124017457605

  • Otto L (2019) Implementing and scaling up telemedicine initiatives: beyond user-centeredness. In: Presented at the 2019 16th IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications. Abu Dhabi, S 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto L, Harst L (2019a) Investigating barriers for the implementation of telemedicine initiatives: a systematic review of reviews. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth Americas conference of information systems. Presented at the AMCIS 2019. Cancun

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto L, Harst L (2019b) Bringing telemedicine into regular care: theoretical underpinning for user-centred design processes. In: Proceedings of the twenty-third Pacific Asia conference on information systems. Presented at the twenty-third Pacific Asia conference on information systems. Xi’an

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto L, Harst L, Timpel P, Wollschlaeger B, Richter P, Schlieter H (2020) Defining and delimitating telemedicine and related terms – an ontology-based classification. In: Maeder AJ, Champion S, Moores C, Golley R (Hrsg) Information technology based methods for health behaviours, studies in health technology and informatics. IOS Press, Amsterdam/Berlin/Washington, DC, S 113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters JM, de Veer AJE, van der Hoek L, Francke AL (2012) Factors influencing the adoption of home telecare by elderly or chronically ill people: a national survey. J Clin Nurs 21:3183–3193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04173.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter P (2019) Bringing care quality to life: towards quality indicator-driven pathway modelling for integrated care networks. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems. Presented at the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Stockholm-Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter P, Schlieter H (2019a) Process-based quality management in care: adding a quality perspective to pathway modelling. In: Panetto H, Debruyne C, Hepp M, Lewis D, Ardagna CA, Meersman R (Hrsg) On the move to meaningful internet systems: OTM 2019 conferences, Lecture notes in computer science. Springer International Publishing, Cham, S 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richter P, Schlieter H (2019b) Understanding patient pathways in the context of integrated health care services – implications from a scoping review. In: Proceedings Der 14. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik. Presented at the 14. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik. Siegen, S 997–1011

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5. Aufl. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlieter H, Sunyaev A, Breitschwerdt R, Sedlmayr M (2019) Editorial – digital health. it – Information Technology 61:209–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2019-0045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S, Dookhy R, Doarn CR, Prakash N, Merrell RC (2007) What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. J Telemed Telecare 13:573–590. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27:425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (WHO) (2015) Global diffusion of eHealth. Making universal health coverage achievable, Global Observatory for eHealth

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland

    Hannes Schlieter, Lena Otto, Peggy Richter & Bastian Wollschlaeger

  2. Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Deutschland

    Lorenz Harst & Patrick Timpel

  3. Mint Medical GmbH, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Andreas Knapp

Authors
  1. Hannes Schlieter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenz Harst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lena Otto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peggy Richter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Patrick Timpel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andreas Knapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bastian Wollschlaeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Schlieter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule Niederrhein, Krefeld, Deutschland

    Thomas Lux

  2. Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Deutschland

    Juliane Köberlein-Neu

  3. Ibbenbüren, Deutschland

    Stefan Müller-Mielitz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schlieter, H. et al. (2022). Diffusionsprozesse digitaler Interventionen erfolgreich gestalten. In: Lux, T., Köberlein-Neu, J., Müller-Mielitz, S. (eds) E-Health-Ökonomie II. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35691-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35691-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-35690-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-35691-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation